Beer in Baltimore: Example #85,721 of Inconsistent Alcohol Regulation By Authorities

20 April 2012

Example #85,721 of Inconsistent Alcohol Regulation By Authorities

We hope to have Example #85,722 shortly, as soon as we don't jinx it.

But today:

Alabama decides Fat Bastard wine is OK, Raging Bitch is OK, but not Founders Dirty Bastard.

1 comment:

JohnM. said...: In fairness Alex, we are talking about "wha wrong wit da beer we got" Alabama. So I can't say this is a huge surprise.

It is pretty funny though.; Friday, 20 April, 2012

Post a Comment

All post content © 2008–2012 Alexander D. Mitchell IV, unless otherwise credited. Non-original content such as photos and quotations of articles reproduced here for purposes of review only, and all rights remain with their creators; please don't sue me. All comments remain the property and responsibility of those who posted them. Logo designed by Elizabeth R. Mitchell Henning. Intended for educational purposes only. Void where prohibited. No other warranty expressed or implied. It may be hazardous to drive a motor vehicle or operate heavy equipment while using a cell phone or getting pregnant. Subject to approval. This is not an offer to sell securities. Close cover before striking. May be too intense for some readers. Are you still reading this? Why are you still reading this? By reading this, you have agreed to give me all the money in your wallet right now. Okay, that's not legally enforceable, but let's see how long it takes someone to read this and respond to me; maybe if I offered a prize to the first person to report that s/he read this sentence.......

20 April 2012

Example #85,721 of Inconsistent Alcohol Regulation By Authorities

1 comment:

COMING TO BALTIMORE FOR BALTIMORE BEER WEEK?

Who is this guy?

CONTACT ME

Blog Archive

Best of Baltimore 2009

More Worthwhile Blogs

More Beer Websites

Networked Blogs