20 April 2011

Washington Post Beer Madness 2011 Winner......

...... is none other than Flying Fish Exit 4 American Trippel.

Read all about it here.  The brackets, with popular votes, here.

Thoughts:  The contest is what it is, basically a run-off competition.  Arrange the brackets differently at the start, and the results would be different.  The public voting amounts to pretty much a popularity contest, with "local" beers such as Evolution garnering high numbers of votes over "out-of-town" competition regardless of the merits of the beers.  Side-by-side tasting is crucial to such judgment.

I would like to see what would happen if this run-off had been held with a bunch of BeerAdvocate.com or RateBeer.com regulars..........

3 comments:

The Oriole Way said...

It looks to me like the popular vote had zero relevance whatsoever in determining which beers advanced. Only the critics' choices mattered.

Alexander D. Mitchell IV said...

That's correct; it's akin to the actual playoffs determining the basketball championships, not the teams' respective popular picks on home brackets.

JohnM. said...

"I would like to see what would happen if this run-off had been held with a bunch of BeerAdvocate.com or RateBeer.com regulars........"

For that matter, how about you Alex? Think the results would be the same (or even similar)?


This was a blind tasting and of course completely subjective. I'm willing to wager that if the same panel conducted the same contest again, the results would be different.

That being said, I never really did understand the reason for even polling a popular vote. That has/had about as much meaning as the results from the "best beer city" contest conducted by Charlie Papazian (where participants could vote as many times as the liked). I thought the poll results for the popular vote were completely predictable.